Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Spica Vs Ace

777
  1. [translate]    #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Barakaldo, Spain
    Posts
    1,204

    Default Spica Vs Ace

    Samsung Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Spica

    What do you think of Galaxy Ace?
    It's know to have 2.3 but... how is it? Is it a good phone? Outdated?
    I just saw an offer where i can take it at a reasonable price.... Im waiting for MIUI One to become available in china, but im becoming quite impatient, and i wish to keep my spica for testing and 2nd phone.....
    What are your thoughts about this phone?
    CyanogenMod-7.2-NIGHTLY-Spica-alpha7 + OC'd kernel

  2. [translate]    #2
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,346

    Default

    I think we already have a thread on this.

    Anyways i wont advice u to buy ACE. Its better than spica but not worth the price.

  3. [translate]    #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    philippines
    Posts
    112

    Default

    i think ace is good mid-end android device. it also have CM7 ported to it.

  4. [translate]    #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Poland, Gdańsk, Tczew
    Posts
    162

  5. [translate]    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Barakaldo, Spain
    Posts
    1,204

    Default

    Does everything work ok? 3D and stuff?
    CyanogenMod-7.2-NIGHTLY-Spica-alpha7 + OC'd kernel

  6. [translate]    #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    22

    Default

    my mom's holding an ace... she doesn't allow me to experiment on it... (yea.. experiment = root) but i did a quick quadrant score and i realised the highest it could go was 500+(w 3D)... on the other hand, tom3q kernel can easily reach 700+ - 800 (w/o 3D). What's the main reason for it?

  7. [translate]    #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    246

    Default

    performance doesn't always measured in quadrant...my mom also had an Ace(unrooted) and i can say that in almost all aspects(stability, speed, gaming, apps, camera) it outperform Spica...,

    ---------- Post added at 05:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:03 PM ----------

    here in the philippines, my mom's brand new ace is almost the same price of my spica when i bought it last year
    Last edited by zhane0513; 10-04-2011 at 05:05 PM.

  8. [translate]    #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Top Fucking Secret
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Well, I just hope my Spica will get the performance of Ace one day. Maybe because of Tom3q, maybe because of other dev...
    Currently, Ace is much better than Spica. If you can buy it for a low price, it is worth a try.

    Remember that Ace's UI is fully GPU accelerated, just as its built-in browser. So the hardware is not very special
    but the smoothness is very, very good like in high-end phones.

  9. [translate]    #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts
    2,825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sunbeam96 View Post
    Remember that Ace's UI is fully GPU accelerated, just as its built-in browser.
    Does it have a different browser than Android's default? If it really uses hardware acceleration, not just software rendering as the default one, we could use it on Spica. Same goes for its launcher (TouchWiz?).
    Last edited by tom3q; 10-07-2011 at 03:02 PM.

  10. [translate]    #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    75

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •