View Poll Results: Are FroYo is stable for u?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • FroYo is Stable

    33 57.89%
  • Froyo is Unstable

    24 42.11%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Froyo is stable for u?

777
  1. [translate]    #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Polska - Kair
    Posts
    90

    Default Froyo is stable for u?

    Froyo is stable for u? Write a post .

    ---------- Post added at 10:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 PM ----------

    Kurna jaki byk ortograficzny

  2. [translate]    #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Venezuela
    Posts
    241

    Default

    In this order of stability:
    1.cm6 a8.4
    2.sgm beta 2.1
    3.sgm +x (beta 3.9)

    Enviado desde mi GT-I5700 usando Tapatalk
    CyanogenMod-7.2-NIGHTLY-Spica-alpha7.2 @ 3.0.8-ahb166+ kernel, 860 on quadrant
    The V6 SuperCharger Script The Original

  3. [translate]    #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Polska - Kair
    Posts
    90

    Default

    50/50 ))

  4. [translate]    #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    bs as
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rskyline View Post
    In this order of stability:
    1.cm6 a8.4
    2.sgm beta 2.1
    3.sgm +x (beta 3.9)

    Enviado desde mi GT-I5700 usando Tapatalk
    cm is the most stable?

  5. [translate]    #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    446

    Default

    You can't say what is stable. Because stability is relative concept.
    Every user use different apps, launcher... they use they phones in different ways.
    For one user cm is best, for other the same configuration is bad and slow.
    So my point is that creating 10 topics like this is useless...

  6. [translate]    #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rskyline View Post
    In this order of stability:
    1.cm6 a8.4
    2.sgm beta 2.1
    3.sgm +x (beta 3.9)

    Enviado desde mi GT-I5700 usando Tapatalk
    Don't be silly.
    Sgm is almost same as cm, so i would say that it doesn't differ in aspect of stability, and if it does, then sgm2 is more stable, cause it was made especially for spica.

    Sgm +x is just sgm modded by voku, It has many tweaks so can be unstable.

    You forgot to mention about 2.2 aosp.

    Sent from my GT-I5700 using Tapatalk
    Deviant MyColorScreen<= my homescreens etc.
    SGM v2.1 | yonip .32 final | all2ext2 |

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalén View Post
    just stop creating this atmosphere aand lets wait all toghether the new kernel in peace just being happy and walking throu the rainbows and you know, singing with animals etc

  7. [translate]    #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Venezuela
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KOala888 View Post
    Don't be silly.
    Sgm is almost same as cm, so i would say that it doesn't differ in aspect of stability, and if it does, then sgm2 is more stable, cause it was made especially for spica.

    Sgm +x is just sgm modded by voku, It has many tweaks so can be unstable.

    You forgot to mention about 2.2 aosp.

    Sent from my GT-I5700 using Tapatalk
    Silly? You say silly if i say that the BASE ROM of sgm is less stable? I don't know what you mean because the only thing i see is that maybe the only advantage is that sgm still has a dev, and i using it right now because of that but i don't get more stability on sgm, and you tell me what can you do on sgm that you can't on cm...

    Enviado desde mi GT-I5700 usando Tapatalk
    CyanogenMod-7.2-NIGHTLY-Spica-alpha7.2 @ 3.0.8-ahb166+ kernel, 860 on quadrant
    The V6 SuperCharger Script The Original

  8. [translate]    #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    India
    Posts
    232

    Default

    Off topic but tom3q's CM 7 is what it's users will agree to as stability..!!

  9. [translate]    #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Froyo is stable, but its stability heavily depends on the installed applications. For example, some weeks ago I used Dolphin Mini instead of the default web browser. After a while I discovered that it caused the free RAM to drop bellow 10M and then... slowdowns and reboots. No mem killer, fast reboot or tweaks could help. I also tried CM6, SGM 2.1, SGM+X, SGM NG and the ram leaks were there. The solution was simple... I uninstalled Dolphin Mini and goodbye mem leaks and so far no more stability problems.

  10. [translate]    #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    622

    Default

    Use opera, the fastest one. About memory, simply change minfree values.



    Sent from my GT-I5700 using Tapatalk
    Deviant MyColorScreen<= my homescreens etc.
    SGM v2.1 | yonip .32 final | all2ext2 |

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalén View Post
    just stop creating this atmosphere aand lets wait all toghether the new kernel in peace just being happy and walking throu the rainbows and you know, singing with animals etc

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •